Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id XAA15839 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 23:40:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA017610106; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 20:41:46 -0800
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 20:41:46 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199603080421.XAA06273@norden1.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Tim Krego <tkrego@norden1.com>
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: CyberGraphX on Amiga (was: AlphaNT Modeler sluggishness)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
At 04:38 PM 3/7/96 -0500, you wrote:
>(debatable and dated digressions deleted)
>
>FYI CyberGraphX software runs on most of the cards so developers
>only have to support its 16 and 24 bit extensions and their software will run
>across multiple graphics cards.
That may be good for diehards, but a little to late for me. Those enhanced
graphics cards were needed 5 years ago. Plus the sheer quantity of products
for the PC have lowered prices to were the Amiga hasn't been about to
compete for almost as long.
I still have my original A1000 and a 500 laying in the basement. Sold the
2000 and 3000 years ago. We still have a 2000/VT4000 system at work for
video editing. It is difficult to stay competitive with an Amiga/LW system,